There are stories of coincidence and chance, of intersections and strange things told, and which is which and who only knows? And we generally say, "Well, if that was in a movie, I wouldn't believe it." - Magnolia

26.1.15

Boyhood and Interstellar: The Moment Seizes You

Boyhood is one of the most talked about films of 2014 and for good reason. Director/writer Richard Linklater, being the incredibly talented and creative filmmaker that he is did something unheard of up to this point in cinematic history. He had a budget of $200,000 for each year over a period of 12 years to film the fictionalized life of a boy, Mason (Ellar Coltrane), from age 6 to 18. He used all of the same actors (including Patricia Arquette and Ethan Hawke as the separated parents and his own daughter as Mason's sister) during each stage of shooting and made most of the script up as he went along. He encouraged the actors to choose their own outfits, haircuts, etc, to most accurately represent natural change in the actors' own lives to lend more authenticity to the film; this included the actors' real life interests such as Coltrane's interest in art and photography portrayed on screen in Mason's own interests. The effect is a 2 hour and 46 minute film that chronicles what real memories of childhood and growing up are like. We tend to remember bits and pieces. Some random happenings for no particular reason, and some for obvious reasons like moving to new cities, divorce, first girlfirends/boyfriends, etc. As a result, Boyhood has no natural arch of rising action and climax. It's a simple, unadorned representation of a very normal life, but it is anything but boring to watch unfold on screen.

IFC Films
Watching Boyhood is a very personal experience. Even though the actions on screen evoke compassion and care for the characters, the sympathy derives itself from our own experiences and we turn to introspection. We remember the frustration of moving, losing friends, dealing with grown up issues at a young age via our parents' struggles, high school relationships and break ups, and the excitement and intimidation of growing up and moving away from the protection of home. As one would expect, the changing person of Mason reflects the challenges we see him face in life and we think about how we have changed and what caused those changes. This one fictionalized example of a very short but important part of life exemplifies the subjective nature of experience. It seems a silly thing to define since it seems obvious, but it is worth reiterating that our experiences are ours and ours alone. All the elements of Boyhood are common, but the people experiencing them are not. 

IFC Films
Although I think Linklater managed to keep many personal opinions out of the script, I don't think he could resist adding one, major thought at the end. The final scene of the film sees Mason in his first day at college with his new roommate and two girls from the same dorm on a hike in the beautiful, Texan countryside at Big Bend. In typical freshman fashion, the group has ingested pot brownies, a sort of ironic wink from Linklater for the dialogue to follow. Mason and one of the girls (who we suspect are immediately attracted to each other) sit and watch the sunset and in their high, philosophical state do some musing. The girl, Nicole, says "You know how everyone's always saying seize the moment? I don't know, I'm kind of thinking it's the other way around, you know, like the moment seizes us." And on this incredible, drug-induced insight the film ends, and it becomes clear. As much as we may try to rebel, especially in the formative, beginning years of our life, much of what happens to us is out of our hands. Our parents make the majority of decisions for us while growing up, and we see the result of this in Boyhood with the string of divorces, moves, and changes Mason experiences because of his parents. Otherwise, our decisions are the result of an endless string of cause and effect from interactions with others and our surroundings.

Now this may sound depressing and nihilistic like there's no point to trying to be a unique individual. It's just a fact of life. However, Boyhood presents it in such a beautiful, optimistic way. Instead of fretting over what may happen tomorrow or into the future, Boyhood encourages us to look into the past and how we have become who we are today, and that may make us want to change or appreciate who we are or a mixture of both. Either way, it's a wonderful reminder, for better or for worse, that who we are today is not who we'll be for ever. Everything is not up to us. The moment seizes us.

Paramount Pictures
But now, let's look to the stars. Literally. Let's compare this to the vastness of Christopher Nolan's epic, space-time odyssey Interstellar (how's that for a transition?). Nolan's latest venture into sci-fi represents everything that is fantastic about the possibility of film. It takes you, visually and audibly, to places you've never been before. The enormity and possibility of space portrayed on screen combined with Hans Zimmer's ethereal soundtrack is probably the best visceral experience you're going to find at the movies for a long time. The film tells how Cooper (Matthew McConaughey) is recruited by NASA to lead a four-man mission through a black hole and to another galaxy to find a habitable planet for humanity since the earth is close to a state where life will be impossible. However, the reality of this black hole and the physics involved means that not only is Cooper's return to his two children doubtful, but that he will be at the mercy of the relativity of time due to gravity. For example, the few hours he spends on one planet near the black hole ends up being 24 years on earth. The result is one of the most heart breaking scenes in cinema this year as Cooper watches with tears streaming down his face video messages from earth of his children becoming adults before his eyes and his daughter, Murphy, (Jessica Chastain) turning the same age he was when he left earth. But the effects of time relativity do not stop there, the film has much more in store than that.

Paramount Pictures
When all is said and done, Interstellar does the opposite of what a lot of films do. Instead of causing the audience to turn towards introspection and ponder their own being, Insterstellar makes you look outside yourselves in awe and terror at what is outside of your control as exemplified in the boundless reaches of space. But most importantly, Nolan emphasizes the relativity of time. It is because of gravity that we experience time the way we do as a flat line. Without going too deep into the film's plot and my inability to accurately describe the physics involved, Nolan plays with the idea of controlling gravity and thus controlling time. So at one point in the film, the past, present, and future are all occurring at once. Harnessing the constant force of gravity allows Cooper to reach across all these dimensions. It's a mind boggling and ridiculous idea, but it highlights the age old struggle of our mortality and being caught in the middle of a beginning and end. This idea connects to Nolan's other major theme in the film: love and human bonding.

During the time when Cooper experiences this folding of time, Nolan introduces the idea that, like gravity, love may be a force that reaches across time and is not constricted by gravity like everything else. It is, I'll admit, a rather cheesy idea, but it works within the context of the film where Cooper and Murphy's close relationship is what drives most of Cooper's heroic feats to save humanity but also return to his family. So even though 60+ years and light years of space separate Cooper and Murphy, their connection still motivates the two of them. And thus, Interstellar does what a lot of movies do but in a different way. Nolan depicts the passing of time using different actors and makeup to "fake" aging and make us believe we're seeing that much time pass on screen. But at the same time, what is 60+ years for Murphy is only a few for Cooper, and yet the two still share a strong bond of love and dedication. In this way, Interstellar is not only an ode to adventure, discovery and the unknown, but to the veracity of the human spirit in the face of overwhelming odds the greatest of which being time.

IFC Films
Now you may see the connection that a space odyssey shares with a boy growing up in Texas. We literally see Mason grow up before our eyes and it causes us to appreciate that period of our lives and reflect on how it made us who we are today and who we might be in the future. On the other hand, we see how Cooper and Murphy are at the mercy of time and the realities of physics and the result is incredibly frustrating and sad to witness. And yet, the love the two share for each other is the constant that defies the science. In the same way, Mason realizes at the end of Boyhood that they've been shaped more by uncontrollable events than by their own efforts. So it seems that, though in very different ways, Boyhood and Interstellar celebrate the resilience and adaptability of the human spirit while acknowledging limitations. Cooper knows the limits of physics but that doesn't stop his thirst for adventure and discovery. Likewise, Mason feels the effects of his parents decisions, but in the end he is not fully like his mother or father, and each parent encourages him to find something that is uniquely his and go for it. As the entirety of Boyhood proves, life is a series of moments and those moments are nowBoyhood may focus on the past but the most important part is the ending which is literally now. Interstellar may focus on the immense struggle against time and separation, but Cooper and Murphy's love is always now.

Paramount Pictures
Both films find their grounding in the importance of present, real things but the future begs the question of how you're going to keep those things going. I could discuss the similarities and themes all day in these films and many others, but I think it is amazing how these two films can share so much in common yet exist on opposite ends of the genre spectrum. Two very different projects with very different minds behind them end up being closer than you would ever expect. Often times the people who emphasize a "seize the moment!" attitude would like to think life and its outcomes is largely within our control, but I think that will most likely lead to disappointment and despair. Nolan and Linklater recognize the big, hostile world out there, ahead of us, but they focus on what we can do to get through. Hold onto the things and people that have got us this far but also learn when to let go to what will only hold us back, When the moment seizes us, don't fight it, but don't just stand by and take it either.

3.7.14

Review: Calvary

Fox Searchlight Pictures
Father James Lavelle (Brendan Gleeson) presides as the local priest at a small Catholic church in a small, picturesque Irish city by the sea. With high, green rolling hills and narrow, cobble stone roads leading down to the water and through the town, it looks like something out of a poem or travel guide for visiting the green isle. The idea of Lavelle's character and role in the town sounds like something even more poetic, but the reality of his mission and life is far less romantic and much more tiresome than one would think. For he is surrounded by a motley crew of parishioners and citizens, none of whom seem to show any actual interest in the church or faith. In fact, there seems to be a general feeling of resentment towards the Catholic church even though Lavelle insists time and again that he does not pretend to speak for or represent the entire church.

29.6.14

Review: The Rover

A24
It's nearly impossible to classify The Rover into any genre. I've been telling my friends it's a dark, morbid, Australian, dystopian, neo-Western. Or that it's a cross between The Road, Mad Max, and The Proposition with hints of Once Upon a Time in the West thrown in there with that barren, silent countryside that is the Australian Outback. I think director/writer David Michod is well aware of all these influences but he refuses to let any of them define his own bleak tale of a future, lawless humanity. After all, Michod spent the early part of his career in film as the editor of Inside Film magazine, stretching his experience beyond filmmaking and into journalistic and academic writing. I'm assuming the knowledge he gained from this has made him acutely aware of genre tropes; especially considering his first film Animal Kingdom in 2010 which tackled the Godfather-esque story of a young man introduced into his criminal family run by his grandmother. In that film as well there are hints of multiple genres and references to Coppola just as there are moments of The Rover that feel very much like Peckinpah. 

24.2.14

2013 Academy Award Predictions


This year is going to be extremely hard to call to say the least. There's 4 or 5 films that easily deserve to win many of the big categories so I don't think it's going to come down to a matter of splitting up the awards. That's what happened with last year's weak turnout of films which resulted in a sort of "everyone's a winner!" ceremony which was extremely frustrating. All the results from the many different guild awards and such point to 12 Years a Slave and Gravity vying for Best Director and Picture, but the rest of the categories remain fairly uncertain with awards spread throughout the nominees leading up to the Oscars. This year is especially hard to call because I enjoyed a number of the films so much and would be pleased to see either win the big awards, but sadly, as is somehow my duty as a film critique, I must make precise predictions. So here we go, and as in previous years I shall differentiate between what I think should win and what will win. Sometimes they are the same, sometimes they are not (and when they're different it's more of a way for me to cheat and be able to make two guesses instead one). I shall skip the "Short" nominations because no normal person like myself could ever see those and/or really care that much.

30.1.14

My Best of 2013



There, that video should get you in the mood for my rather late contribution to the "best ofs" lists of 2013. Unlike most film critics who's lists came out sometime back in December, I do not get paid to see movies and write about them, so I am only coming out with the list now because I feel adequately prepared. I did my best to see the most important and talked about movies of 2013. The one major hole in my viewing is Nebraska which has found its place on many top lists of the year, but I just didn't get around to it. So hopefully I don't see it after a few weeks and decide its the greatest, but somehow I doubt that will happen. I also did not see Blue is the Warmest Color (or as some call it "blue is the longest movie"), but somehow I doubt I would like it that much?

Anyway, 2013 was a pretty darn great year for movies. Things weren't looking so hot (pun!) during the Summer with all the boring blockbusters coming out (Iron Man 3 and World War Z, I'm looking at you). Needless to say, I felt very glad for the friend I had working at the local Regal who made it so I didn't have to pay for nearly all of those films. But then the Fall and Winter season of films and award contenders came out and wow, I was getting flashbacks to 2007 which in my opinion is one of the greatest years for film in my lifetime so far (There Will be Blood, No Country for Old Men, Into the Wild, just to name a few). This year's Academy Awards is going to be a tough one to call in almost every category. Films from genres of all kinds and with all sorts of interesting stories and themes could win big awards this year and it's been a blast getting to watch them all. And with that, I'll get to my list which was very hard to make. So much so that I decided to go with a top 15 instead of the normal 10.

23.1.14

Review: The Wolf of Wall Street

Paramount Pictures
Remember Goodfellas? Remember how that movie transported you into the mafia world of ritzy homes, cars, restaurants, clothes, along with the betrayal, murder, violence? And who could forget that shocking opening scene where Joe Pesci stabs a badly beaten man in the trunk of a car repeatedly with a giant kitchen knife. That movie knew how to shock and entertain unlike any other with brilliant pacing, characters, and multiple unforgettable scenes. Before Goodfellas arrived in 1990, The Godfather stilled ruled the cinema of mafia movies, but Goodfellas put a new twisted edge on things that one might even call comical. Sort of a twisted sense of humor behind Pesci's shocking violence and Ray Liotta's manic paranoia.

And that is all thanks to the legendary talents of Martin Scorsese. Scorsese has been making movies since the early 70s and amazingly enough has only won best director once with The Departed in 2006. There's a sleekness and pacing to Scorsese's films that is undeniable but oft imitated (most recently with American Hustle). However, he's been on a sort of experimental road recently with Shutter Island and Hugo, both quite unusual films for him but both quite good. Still, they weren't like the Scorsese films of old. It seemed that once he finally won an Oscar he decided to let loose for a little while and try something different.

21.1.14

Review: Inside Llewyn Davis

CBS Films
For the Coen Brothers, there's generally three levels for their films: weird, weirder, and super weird. On the weird side you've got films like A Serious Man that aren't overly bizarre but still have a host of very quirky, awkward characters and some ridiculous scenarios, and on the other end of the spectrum you've got films like Barton Fink that almost make no sense at all but are still somehow genius. It's always a treat whenever a Coen Bros. movie comes out because you're never quite sure what you're going to get, but the result is always something unlike anything else that year and often times unlike anything you've ever seen.

There's no doubt that the Coens are some of the best directors working in America today and they've proved it over and over again by tackling a whole host of different genres including thriller, western, film noir, comedy (of course you could say this about every one of their movies), and arguably musical (with O Brother, Where Art Thou?). And that last one marks a significant facet of the Coens' movies I always appreciate: the soundtracks. Composer Carter Burwell generally pairs with the Coens to compose original soundtracks or else the legendary T-Bone Burnett produces amazing folksy, blue-grass tunes. Sometimes there's no soundtrack at all as with the chilling No Country for Old Men. This time around, Burnett teams up with the brothers once again to tell the tale of down-and-out folk singer Llewyn Davis trying to make it in the music scene of 1960's Greenwich Village.